This is typically done using either Peltier cooling, which is suitable for temperatures down to o C, and liquid nitrogen cryogenic cooling. Most Raman systems use Peltier cooled detectors, but liquid nitrogen cooled detectors still have advantages for certain specialized applications.
It is able to detect single photon events without an image intensifier, using a unique electron multiplying structure built into the chip.
EMCCD cameras are designed to overcome a fundamental physical constraint to deliver high sensitivity with high speed. Traditional CCD cameras offered high sensitivity, with low readout noises, but at the expense of slow readout. EMCCD overcame this by amplifying the signal. That means that the readout noise is effectively by-passed and is no longer is a limit on sensitivity. It produces multiplication gain through the process of impact ionization in silicon.
When photons are scarce, the signal reaching the imaging device may be weak enough to blend with the background noise. EMCCD technology is designed to reduce the inherent electronic noise of the readout process.
EMCCD cameras overcome most low light imaging. These detectors also support faster frame acquisition rates than their CCD counterparts, making them highly suitable for live imaging. In an FLS Fluorescence Spectrometer configured for CCD detection, a single emission monochromator is used as a spectrograph that directs the emission from the sample to the input window of the CCD camera. The monochromator has one port with a computer-controlled slit for PMT detection, and a second imaging port with a wide aperture for the CCD Figure 1.
When acquiring spectral data with the CCD camera, the monochromator is set to the centre wavelength of the emission spectrum.
The instrument incorporates an Xe excitation lamp, double excitation monochromator, and single emission monochromator with a PMT and CCD detector.
In the following Figures , excitation-emission maps acquired with CCD detectors are shown. The software allows the user to display the data as 2D, contour maps and 3D plots. To obtain a map with this resolution an acquisition time of 58 min was required, compared to 90 h needed when a PMT is used. Dierolf, V. High-resolution site selective optical spectroscopy of rare earth and transition metal defects in insulators.
The variation, known as shot noise, is always present. The plot to the right shows a magnified view of the noise. Shot noise, also referred to as quantum noise, is caused by the statistical variation in the counting of the number of photons and cannot be eliminated. This variation follows a classical Poisson distribution and can be described as the square root of the number of detected photons in the measurement period.
The statistical variation for a photon measurement would be between 95 and photons. Shot noise is almost always the dominant detector noise source in experiments employing cooled CCD-based detection systems once the signal rises above any background signal.
The dark signal can be subtracted except for the 7 counts of noise. Thermoelectric cooling reduces the dark noise below the shot noise in most cases. Liquid nitrogen cooling can eliminate the dark signal completely in most spectroscopic applications. Just as photons can free electrons, thermal vibrations within the sensor can do the same. The number of freed electrons for any given temperature and acquisition period is very reproducible.
With uncooled or minimally cooled detectors the dark current can often be higher than the signal being measured. Taking a dark measurement for the same integration time as the measurement and subtracting it from the measurement is a common practice.
There is however, an analogous shot noise component in the dark current. The colder the sensor, the lower the dark current and its associated noise. A liquid nitrogen LN cooled CCD has a dark current in the fractions of electrons per pixel hour range, and for all practical purposes, does not have a dark noise component. These CCDs have noise components in the fractions of electrons per second, which for most applications, is more than adequate.
However, for extremely weak phenomena requiring integration times in the minutes range, a LN cooled detector may be a more appropriate choice. There is no possibility, even with averaging multiple readouts to see any difference when shot noise is taken into consideration.
Readout noise is due to uncertainty in the reading process. Readout noise is usually specified as some number of electrons RMS. RMS, Root Mean Squared, is a statistical measurement and the actual number of electrons read out for any pixel could vary over an approximate peak to peak range of 5 times the RMS value. A difference of a few electrons in readout noise has no discernible effect on the overall SNR in even the most difficult applications.
Readout noise is measured in total darkness with the minimal attainable integration time. A signal of only 25 photoelectrons in a measurement period would have a shot noise above the readout noise of most scientific grade CCD detectors.
While statistically a 1 electron difference is detectable for any single repeated measurement, there are over pixels being read out in a spectrum. For any given pixel, the device with the higher RMS readout noise may in fact have lower noise. When the shot noise from the signal is superimposed over this, there is no possibility of making a measurable distinction. The features in this spectrum are all due to cosmic rays.
Exposures of more than 10 minutes are not recommended for SNR limited spectra. Cosmic rays are ever present. When one strikes a CCD sensor it may cause electrons to be freed along its path. Some of those will be captured and add to the noise. For most applications, cosmic rays are not a factor, as the signal is usually stronger and the integration time short. For extremely weak phenomena however, where the signal may be in the 10s of photons per second range, and integration times approach 20 to 30 minutes, cosmic ray-induced noise can render a spectrum unreadable.
Most spectroscopic software has a cosmic ray removal algorithm. In essence, two spectra are taken and any feature not found in both spectra is subtracted.
However, cosmic rays cross columns and rows, and even with the algorithm, long exposure spectra can be distorted beyond analytical validity. See Fig. There are several options to consider when selecting a sensor.
Quantum efficiency QE is often considered the most important. The QE indicates what percentage of the photons that strike the sensor will ultimately result in an electron being captured and read. A standard front illuminated sensor has virtually no sensitivity below nm and would be inappropriate for UV measurements. This indicates that for the same incident flux, the OE sensor produces twice as many detectable electrons. The BIUV can acquire equivalent data in 0.
In deciding between a back illuminated CCD and a front illuminated version, it is the relative difference in QE that matters, given conditions that are not shot noise or time limited. A back illuminated sensor is most appropriate for weak, one-shot kinetic or reaction-time limited measurements in the sub-second range or in cases where the necessary integration times are very long and there is potential for cosmic ray effects.
This corresponds to the difference in SNR between the red and green spectra. In the UV however, the relative difference can be over four times, corresponding to the difference between the red and violet spectra.
This yields a SNR improvement of 1. In the UV however, there is a significant difference between a front illuminated UV coated and a back illuminated sensor; as high as five times the QE. Purchasing a sensor with the highest QE does not always guarantee a meaningful improvement in spectral quality. It almost always however, adds to the cost. In low light applications, where the pixel size is not the limiting resolution factor, having a larger pixel produce a better SNR as the ratio of signal induced electrons to the readout noise will be higher than for a smaller pixel.
The FWC of a sensor is specified in thousand electrons, ke-, and indicates the total number of electrons that can be measured in a readout register pixel.
The pixels in the readout register are usually slightly larger than the others. As electrons are transferred down the columns to the readout register pixel, the FWC is also the maximum for any column. In most low light level applications this is not an issue. In applications where the light is relatively intense or where the measurement can be made over a time scale that permits maximizing of the signal, it can be important.
A larger FWC permits the measurement of more intense signals. It may also permit a higher dynamic range in the measurement, i. Pixel size has been associated with better spectral resolution. The only applications where this difference in size may have an effect are those with extremely narrow atomic emission spectra taken with long focal length, low aperture spectrographs. For all other applications, selecting a spectrograph and grating combination that has a higher resolution than required for the measurement is more important.
Most molecular spectra, Raman and fluorescence for example, have relatively broad features and can be measured with spectrographs between 0. A higher grating density or longer focal length spectrograph would permit the use of a wider entrance slit for equivalent resolution, and more importantly, would capture more light. The slit width is the determining factor in resolution. If the slit width is greater than the pixel width, the pixel will not have any effect on resolution.
0コメント